Sunday, April 26, 2015

The defendants make six arguments as to why the judgment of the court should be reversed:
(1) the court erred in failing to bar the plaintiff's claims under the first amendment to the United States constitution;
(2) the trial judge exhibited bias and partiality that constituted plain error;
(3) the court erred in relying on hearsay statements to determine that the defendants intended to inflict emotional distress upon the plaintiff;
(4) there was insufficient evidence to support the finding of intentional infliction of emotional distress;
(5) there was insufficient evidence to support the finding of defamation; and
(6) the court erred in awarding compensatory and punitive damages to the plaintiff. For the following reasons, we disagree with the defendants and affirm the judgment of the court.

http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=7465487

No comments:

Post a Comment